Rhythmic Foundations, and the Necessary Aesthetic in Peirce’s Categories :: Philosophy Philosophical Papers

Rhythmic Foundations, and the Necessary Aesthetic in Peirces CategoriesABSTRACT There has been a angle of dip in scholarship to train quite clear of discussions of Peirce and Aesthetics, and I believe that the main reason that Peirces consummations needinesss, mayhap even intentionally, a clear artistic possibleness is because his entire architectonic of receive is artistically founded. This thesis is based, in part, on the necessary aesthetic descriptions one is forced to use when describing something such as the categories. For example, Secondness necessarily elicits aesthetic descriptions of relations and tensions, Thirdness is described most accurately with actors line such as harmony and arrangement, and the process by which we come to reveal a belief is an aesthetic endeavor aimed at satisfaction. Focusing specially on the categories, and secondarily on the method for attaining belief, I hope to leaven that Peirces foundation is, itself, an aesthetic awareness of lif e.There has been a tendency to steer quite clear of discussions of Peirce and Aesthetics. Over and over, statements by Peircean scholars attest to the lack of philosophical guidance regarding the status and judgment of art that is available in his writings.(1) Peirce himself states that, My notion would be that there are innumerable varieties of esthetic quality, precisely no purely esthetic grade of excellence.(2) Doug Anderson also states that a Peircean aesthetic is hard to piece together because it was a very late appurtenance to Peirces classification of the sciences. That is, even though aesthetics is presupposed by ethics, logic, and metaphysics, in Peirces prioritization of the sciences, his intention was that aesthetics was to be understood through the work he had already done in the other branches of his system.(3)This vagueness hasnt, however, prevented scholars from speculating on the aesthetic in Peirces works. Yet even so, we are still approach with many problems. F irst is the paleontological reconstruction, as Herman Parret states, of the various trivial references by Peirce regarding the aesthetic. Second, it is claimed that if any approach to a Peircean aesthetic is going to be worthwhile, it will probably be too large to handle because it moldiness incorporate his views on logic, metaphysics and theology.(4) Third, as pointed out by Beverly Kent, Peirce seems to conflate dickens senses of the aesthetic, where it is both a quality that is immediately present and an ultimate ideal.(5)I will argue that the main reason that Peirces works lacks, perhaps even intentionally, a clear aesthetic theory is because his depiction of experience is aesthetically founded.